Judge dismisses cancerous lawsuit against Robert DeNiro
March 12th, 2008 by Scott Marks
Hide and seek refuge in another multiplex
LOS ANGELES - Listen you screwheads, the honorable Judge Rolf M. Treu has found Bobby D. blameless in a lawsuit filed against the actor by an insurance company that claimed he misrepresented his health for a movie role.
Where do they get their balls big enough to file an accusation like that?
Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co. handled the despisable horror film Hide and Seek in which the “greatest actor of his generation” was bested by that scene-stealing moppet Dakota Fanning. The company claimed the actor lied about his condition when he wrote that he had never been diagnosed with or treated for prostate cancer.
The Associated Press reports that court documents prove that De Niro was diagnosed with prostate cancer on Oct. 15, 2003, two days after he signed the medical certificate. De Niro underwent a prostate-gland biopsy on Oct. 10, 2003.
A Los Angeles Superior Court granted De Niro’s motion for summary judgment on Monday.
“This ruling vindicates what we’ve said all along,” De Niro’s attorney Robyn Crowther said. “We are pleased that the court has found that Fireman’s Fund can’t sue Mr. De Niro for getting cancer.”
Too bad fans and critics can’t sue Mr. DeNiro. Through his career choices, for the past ten years Robert DeNiro has willingly and knowingly spread an insidious strain of multiplex cancer throughout malls across America. There should have been wanted posters slapped on every box office that sold tickets for Stardust offering a million dollar reward for information leading to DeNiro’s arrest on charges of prostitution.
De Niro’s diagnosis and resulting treatment delayed the movie production. Fireman’s Fund paid Fox more than $1.8 million to cover the cost of the delay. Hide and Seek metastasized in theaters in January 2005.
Tags: Dropped, HIDE AND SEEK, Lauwsuit, Prostate cancer, Robert DeNiroFiled Under News